The IOF has decided to include ‘MicrO’ as part fo the Middle Distance race at next year’s WOC. Below is some info that might help elites to understand what MicrO is. OA HP is currently endeavouring to have some MicrO races organised next year as part of NOL.
Here is a Grant Bluett translation of what Bjorna Valstad wrote about Micro-O on his web site http://www.staff-valstad.com/
The question I’ve asked myself is, “what is the difference between micro and regular orienteering?” Looking at the maps from the middle distance champs shows the course in three loops, one of them is micro. You have to race a course on a map. The course includes a certain number of controls. You had to visit the controls in the right order and punch at the right controls. Do you recognize the idea? What is the main difference between micro and a “regular” O’ race? Seen from this point of view, isn’t micro just a short O’ course on a large scale map. That isn’t something new. What is new with micro? 1. We are forced to adapt to a different scale during the middle of the race. 2. We have to actually orienteer all the way to the feature and not just run to the circle and look for the marker. Both of these things mean that the orienteer is stressed and it increases the demands on orienteering technique. It is tough. Micro…is demanding. I have no doubt that the concept favors the best orienteers. The legs are short and that puts a huge demand on map reading and concentration. A second’s lapse or running at the wrong speed can cause significant time loss. Forget about the name micro. It is orienteering and so the name should remain “orienteering.”…